Esta página destina-se apenas a fins informativos. Certos serviços e funcionalidades podem não estar disponíveis na sua jurisdição.

Wormhole vs LayerZero: Stargate Acquisition Battle and Its Implications for Cross-Chain Interoperability

Introduction to the Stargate Acquisition Battle

The cryptocurrency space is witnessing a high-stakes acquisition race between Wormhole and LayerZero over Stargate, a leading cross-chain protocol. This competition has sparked debates about valuation models, governance structures, and the future of decentralized finance (DeFi). With Stargate's treasury valued at $92M and its total value locked (TVL) at $345M, the outcome of this acquisition could reshape the cross-chain interoperability landscape.

Stargate's Treasury and Valuation

Stargate boasts a robust treasury that includes $92M in stablecoins and ether, alongside a historical transfer volume of $70B. Its integration across 80+ blockchains and $4B in bridge volume reported in July 2025 highlight its significant economic potential. Critics argue that LayerZero's acquisition proposal undervalues these assets, raising concerns about the long-term implications for Stargate's growth.

Key Metrics of Stargate's Treasury

  • Stablecoins and Ether Holdings: $92M

  • Historical Transfer Volume: $70B

  • Bridge Volume (July 2025): $4B

  • Blockchain Integrations: 80+

LayerZero's Acquisition Proposal and Its Implications

LayerZero has proposed acquiring Stargate for $110M, with plans to swap all STG tokens for ZRO tokens at a fixed rate. This move would dissolve Stargate DAO and redirect future protocol revenue to ZRO buybacks. Proponents of this strategy emphasize its potential to accelerate cross-chain interoperability by consolidating Stargate's user base and roadmap under a unified governance framework.

Concerns Over Revenue Redistribution

  • Quarterly Bridge Revenue: $939K

  • Impact on Token Holders: Redistribution from STG staking rewards to ZRO buybacks could reduce incentives for STG holders.

Wormhole's Competing Bid and Strategic Goals

Wormhole has submitted a competing bid, arguing that LayerZero's offer undervalues Stargate's treasury and future economic potential. Wormhole emphasizes the creation of a "market-dominant ecosystem" by merging its liquidity with Stargate's cross-chain integrations. To finalize its offer, Wormhole has requested a five-day suspension of the current vote.

Wormhole's Strategic Objectives

  • Enhancing Cross-Chain Infrastructure: Strengthen its position in the interoperability space.

  • Valuation Concerns: Advocates for preserving Stargate's economic potential.

Cross-Chain Interoperability and Ecosystem Consolidation

Both Wormhole and LayerZero aim to consolidate Stargate's cross-chain capabilities into their respective ecosystems. Stargate's integration across 80+ blockchains and its historical transfer volume make it a valuable asset for accelerating interoperability. However, the risks of consolidating cross-chain infrastructure under a single entity remain a critical point of discussion.

Benefits of Consolidation

  • Accelerated Interoperability: Unified governance could streamline development.

  • Enhanced Liquidity: Mergers often lead to increased liquidity and user adoption.

Risks of Consolidation

  • Centralization Concerns: Could undermine decentralized governance principles.

  • Security Vulnerabilities: Alleged "backdoor" vulnerabilities in LayerZero's proposal.

DeFi Valuation Models and Governance Structures

The acquisition race underscores broader tensions in DeFi valuation models and governance structures. Stargate DAO's dissolution under LayerZero's proposal has sparked debates about the long-term implications for decentralized governance. Wormhole's competing bid offers an alternative perspective, emphasizing the importance of preserving Stargate's economic potential.

Governance Implications

  • LayerZero's Proposal: Dissolution of Stargate DAO.

  • Wormhole's Approach: Focus on maintaining decentralized governance.

Historical Precedents of Acquisitions in the Crypto Space

Historical precedents, such as Binance's acquisition of Trust Wallet, suggest that mergers can lead to increased liquidity and user adoption. However, the Stargate acquisition differs in its focus on cross-chain interoperability, making it a unique case study in the crypto space.

Lessons from Past Acquisitions

  • Liquidity Growth: Successful mergers often boost liquidity.

  • User Adoption: Integration with larger ecosystems can drive adoption.

Security Concerns and Governance Transparency

LayerZero's proposal has faced scrutiny over alleged governance and security vulnerabilities, including claims of a "backdoor" vulnerability raised by competitors like Nomad. These concerns add a layer of skepticism to the acquisition and highlight the importance of transparency in cross-chain protocols.

Key Security Concerns

  • Backdoor Vulnerabilities: Allegations from competitors.

  • Governance Transparency: Ensuring trust in protocol operations.

Stargate DAO's Voting Process and Community Dynamics

The Stargate DAO vote requires a 70% supermajority for approval, making community dynamics a critical factor in the acquisition's outcome. The vote's result will hinge on the perceived long-term value of integration with LayerZero versus Wormhole's competing bid.

Voting Requirements

  • Supermajority Threshold: 70% approval needed.

  • Community Sentiment: Key driver of the vote's outcome.

Revenue Redistribution and Its Impact on Token Holders

LayerZero's proposal to redirect $939K in quarterly bridge revenue from STG staking rewards to ZRO buybacks has sparked debates about its impact on token holders. While proponents argue that this move could enhance ZRO's value, critics highlight the potential loss of incentives for STG holders.

Stakeholder Impact

  • Proponents' View: Increased ZRO value.

  • Critics' Concerns: Reduced incentives for STG holders.

Market Reactions to Acquisition Announcements

The acquisition race has generated significant market interest, with analysts closely monitoring its implications for cross-chain interoperability and DeFi governance. The outcome of this battle could set a precedent for future acquisitions in the crypto space.

Analyst Insights

  • Cross-Chain Interoperability: Key focus area for market observers.

  • DeFi Governance: Potential shifts in governance models.

Conclusion

The Wormhole vs LayerZero acquisition battle over Stargate is more than a financial transaction; it represents a pivotal moment in the evolution of cross-chain infrastructure and DeFi governance. As the Stargate DAO vote approaches, the crypto community will be watching closely to see which proposal prevails and how it shapes the future of decentralized finance.

Aviso legal
Este conteúdo é fornecido apenas para fins informativos e pode abranger produtos que não estão disponíveis na sua região. Não se destina a fornecer (i) aconselhamento ou recomendações de investimento; (ii) uma oferta ou solicitação para comprar, vender ou deter ativos de cripto/digitais, ou (iii) aconselhamento financeiro, contabilístico, jurídico ou fiscal. As detenções de ativos de cripto/digitais, incluindo criptomoedas estáveis, envolvem um nível de risco elevado e podem sofrer grandes flutuações. Deve ponderar cuidadosamente se o trading ou a detenção de ativos de cripto/digitais são adequados para si, tendo em conta a sua situação financeira. Consulte o seu profissional jurídico/fiscal/de investimentos para tirar dúvidas sobre as suas circunstâncias específicas. As informações (incluindo dados de mercado e informações estatísticas, caso existam) apresentadas nesta publicação destinam-se apenas para fins de informação geral. Embora tenham sido tomadas todas as precauções razoáveis na preparação destes dados e gráficos, a OKX não assume qualquer responsabilidade por erros ou omissões aqui expressos.

© 2025 OKX. Este artigo pode ser reproduzido ou distribuído na sua totalidade, ou podem ser utilizados excertos de 100 palavras ou menos deste artigo, desde que essa utilização não seja comercial. Qualquer reprodução ou distribuição do artigo na sua totalidade deve indicar de forma clara: “Este artigo é © 2025 OKX e é utilizado com permissão.” Os excertos permitidos devem citar o nome do artigo e incluir a atribuição, por exemplo, "Nome do artigo, [o nome do autor, caso aplicável], © 2025 OKX." Alguns conteúdos podem ser gerados ou ajudados por ferramentas de inteligência artificial (IA). Não são permitidas obras derivadas ou outros usos deste artigo.